Overview
Impact
Design System
Problem
Process
Showcase
Prototype
Reflection
IPS Platform
Problem
Research
Users
Solution
Prototype
Reflection

Cambridge Associates • 2025

Overhaul of design system & optimization of internal tooling

Role

UX Design Intern

Timeline

3 Months

Skills

Design System
Prototyping
User Interviews

Team

1 Senior PM
2 Designers

Overview

What is Cambridge Associates?

CA is a global investment firm founded in 1973 that provides investment advisory and portfolio management services to institutional investors including endowments, foundations, pension plans, and private clients. With offices worldwide, the firm manages custom investment portfolios for over 850 clients globally.

2 problems needed to be solved

Design System

3 different design systems across their internal, investment, and customer-facing platforms. My objective was to find a way to merge them to one unifiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaed system.

IPS Platform

Investment documents were being manually inputted and followed no structure . My goal was to design a system that formalized and automated the process.

Impact

$276B+

AUM handled through redesigned platforms

700+

components and variants designed and documented

1400+

employees using newly designed system

Project #1

Design System Overhaul

Problems

Design Differences

Jumps between 3 different design systems caused poor representation of the company and confusion among new products.

Outdated Figma architecture

Early transition from Adobe left files using legacy features, lacking modern Figma capabilities (auto-layout, variants, etc.)

Poor documentation

Developers struggled to implement designs without clear specifications, slowing handoff and causing inconsistencies

Accessibility gaps

Inconsistent font sizes and color combinations failed to meet accessibility standards (WCAG)

Solution Preview

New component + documentation

New error color for accessibility

Process

3-step Process

Understand

  • Audited usage across platforms

  • Gathered designer/dev requirements

  • Set sizing, spacing, accessibility specs

Build

  • Built variants in Figma

  • Wrote usage guidelines

  • Establish new variables

Ship

  • Reviewed with senior UX

  • Shipped to shared library

  • Delivered specs & tokens

Showcase

Published components in official Figma file

Badges component documentation

Badges component documentation

Prototype

Use of new components in real products*

*Information has been cleaned to adhere to NDA*

Main portfolio management platform (default variant for components)

Portfolio management chart view (Showcase of dark mode component variants)

Reflection

Key Takeaways

Details matter

This project showed how pixels can have effects on a product as multiple errors can compound and if not fully communicated to engineering, can result in the final product not looking like the design.

Slow is fast

When I initially started I tried to speed through components which would results in a lot of mistakes. I would have to go back to redo it and end up using more time than if I had done it slowly but correctly.

Project #2

IPS* Platform

*Investment Policy Statements are documents that outline a client's investment objectives, constraints, and guidelines. A VERY critical document for portfolio management.

Problems

Manual Work Eating Time

Investors, analysts, and compliance had to manually transcribed IPS information into spreadsheets into database which took too much time as client base grew.

Errors + Inconsistencies

Due to the manual nature of input, human errors and inconsistencies were frequent as everyone had their own workflow.

Solution Preview

All-in-one tool to consistently access data

AI-assisted data parsing to reduce manual work

Research

Observe current workflows and research new tools

I sat down with analysts to understand their workflows and pain points that came with their current manual process. This uncovered inefficiency points which were documented as error patters and bottlenecks. We then explored technical tools such as LLMs and the current database structure to see how they could be integrated.

ChatGPT enterprise was picked as the safest and cost effective solution

Users

Primary Users & Use Cases

Analysts & Investors

Input and review IPS data, manage client information

Compliance Officers

Verify accuracy and approve entries before database upload

User Needs

Solution

AI-Powered Processing Platform

Document Upload & AI Parsing

Upload IPS documents; AI extracts key information and presents for review

Review & Validation Workflow

Analysts verify AI-extracted data and make corrections

Compliance Approval & Database Flow

Submitted entries route to compliance officers for review; can approve or send back with feedback. Approved entries automatically upload to internal database

Spreadsheet-Style Interface

Familiar data manipulation tools (sorting, filtering, formulas) to reduce training time

Technical Implemntation

Prototype

Screens from full design

Main Login Screen

Landing Page of all accessible clients

Uploaded view of IPS document

Approved all tables from IPS

Reflection

Key Takeaways

Learn from users

The best way to do research is to sit down with users and actually watch them perform their pain point. Talk to them and empathizing is one thing but taking time to witness their struggles is another thing.

Familiarity is king

Users are most comfortable using products they recognize. For this product, don't over-design the spreadsheet editing and copy what current designs are like as that is what users are most familar with.